• Reset
Ann Ig. 2024 Mar 21. doi: 10.7416/ai.2024.2606. Online ahead of print

Influenza and Covid-19 Vaccination in 2023: a descriptive analysis in two Italian Research and Teaching Hospitals. Is the On-Site strategy effective?

Pier Mario Perrone1,2, Simone Villa1, Giuseppina Maria Raciti1, Laura Clementoni1, Valentina Vegro1, Francesco Scovenna1, Augusto Altavilla1, Adriana Monica Tomoiaga1, Valentina Beltrami1, Ilaria Bruno1, Marcello Vaccargiu1, Elisa Astorri1, Navpreet Tiwana3, Matteo Letzgus3, Peter Johannes Schulz4, Fabrizio Ernesto Pregliasco1,5, Silvana Castaldi1,3

1 Department Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
2 Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
3 Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
4 Faculty of Communication Sciences, Institute of Communication and Health, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
5 IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant’Ambrogio, Milan, Italy

Abstract

Introduction.
Vaccinations represent an extremely effective tool for the prevention of certain infectious diseases – such as influenza and  COVID-19 -, particularly for those categories at risk due to both their frail condition or professional exposure, such as  healthcare workers. The aim of this study is to describe the course of the anti-influenza and anti-COVID-19 vaccination  campaign at two Research Hospitals in Milan, Italy.

Study design.
Multicentre, cross-sectional study.

Methods.
For the 2023-24 vaccination campaign, the two facilities opted for two different approaches. At the Hospital A, two different strategies for vaccinating healthcare workers were implemented: a fixed-site vaccination clinic and two mobile  vaccination groups run by Public Health residents of the University of Milan. At the Hospital B, on the other hand, a single  fixed-site outpatient clinic run by Public Health residents of the University of Milan was used. On the occasion of the  campaign, a survey was also carried out using anonymous online questionnaires to investigate healthcare workers attitudes  towards vaccination.

Results.
A total of 1,937 healthcare workers were vaccinated: 756 were immunized against influenza only, 99 against COVID-19 only,  and 1,082 against both. The results show a substantial difference in vaccination adherence among medical and nursing staff compared to other professional categories. In particular, the category with the highest vaccination adhesion turned out to  be that of medical doctors with 55.7% adhesion while, on the contrary, the category with the lowest adhesion turned out to be  that of auxiliary personnel characterized by 7.4% adhesion. At the same time, the comparison between the two hospital  facilities showed a double adherence rate by the staff of Hospital A as regards both the flu vaccine (40.6% and 20.1%) and  the anti-COVID-19 vaccine (26.4% and 12.3%). Finally, the survey showed that the attitude towards influenza vaccination is  lower among auxiliary staff in terms of both knowledge and vaccination attitude.

Conclusions.
The results of the study show a vaccination adherence in line with that of previous years, although lower than the values  recommended by the principal national and international Organizations. The analysis of the differences between the two facilities and the surveys carried out will allow for the implementation of targeted interventions to increase adherence in  future campaigns.

KEYWORDS: Influenza vaccine; COVID 19 vaccine; healthcare workers
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
WhatsApp